Trump Headed For HUGE Win Tonight In Nevada

Trump Headed For HUGE Win Tonight In Nevada

Experts predict Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump is headed for another big victory in the Nevada caucus tonight, thus giving “The Donald” wins in three of the first four contests and adding to his unquestionable front runner status for the nomination.

According to Politico:

“Donald Trump is the favorite to win Tuesday’s Nevada GOP caucuses, an outcome that would give him victories in three of the four early-voting states.

According to The POLITICO Caucus – a collection of strategists, operatives and activists on the ground in Nevada – Trump is poised to defeat Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio on Tuesday night, despite relatively little attention on the caucuses compared to the three previous states.

Roughly three-quarters of Nevada insiders from both parties predicted Trump will emerge on top, with Cruz and Rubio – who finished behind Trump last Saturday in South Carolina – splitting the remaining vote.”

[wpdevfb]

10 COMMENTS

  1. The Donald is the ONLY Republican candidate that will stand up to and take NO SHIT from the Liberal Dogs of the democratic party or the rnc, McCain, McConnell or any of the rhino republican establishment. I’m sure Carson and Cruz would also , to a degree, but not like Trump would and that’s the way it has to be which is what’s scaring the hell out of both parties. It scares them because their big government pay days will come to an end under Trump.

    • AMEN. EAGLES_76 AMEN BROTHER. MR. TRUMP MR. PRESIDENT SIR. YES HE WILL ABSOLUTLEY SHAKE OUT THE PARASITES he will build the wall and what gets me is this so called poop. Aka. Pope has the gall to call out MR. TRUMP ABOUT BEING A CHRISTIAN FOR THE IDEA FOR BUILDING A WALL YET THIS SO CALLED SUPPOSE TO BE LEADER LIVES IN A MANSION BEHIND A HUGE WALL TO KEEP PPL OUT. THIS POOP IS A LIAR A TRAITOR A BACK STABBING AMERICA HATING PARASITE THAT SIDES WITH THE CRIMINAL IN CHEF THAT HAS NO RESPECT / LOVE ;/ HONOR FOR OUR COUNTRY THAT HE IS SUPPOSE TO PROTECT AND UP HOLD ALL THE LAWS OF OUR COUNTRY

  2. ISSUE 1: Is Ted Cruz a “native born” citizen?

    He was born in Canada. His mother was an American citizen and born in
    the U.S., but left the U.S. and moved to Canada. His father was Cuban
    born. Ted Cruz was born in Canada, not the U.S.

    ISSUE 2: “Does Ted Cruz qualified to run for President?”

    Cruz
    may not be qualified
    to be President as he was born in Canada, not the U.S. He is being
    challenged in Court right now. Will he be challenged by the Democrats
    once he has been chosen to run with Donald Trump as Vice President. I
    really like Ted Cruz’s background and his education. He is a very smart
    man. But………?

    Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth
    the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States,
    under clause 5:

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United
    States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be
    eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible
    to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five
    Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United
    States.

    The Twelfth Amendment states, “No person constitutionally
    ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”

    Here is some of my research of the facts.

    Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running
    for the Republican Party’s nomination for president in the 2016
    election.[121] Cruz was born in Calgary,
    Alberta, Canada,[122] to a “U.S. citizen
    mother and a Cuban immigrant father”,[123] giving him dual
    Canadian-American citizenship.[124] Cruz applied to
    formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of
    Canada, on May 14, 2014.[125][126] Professor Chin,[123] former Solicitor General Paul
    Clement,[127] former Acting
    Solicitor General Neal
    Katyal,[127] and Professor Peter
    Spiro of Temple University Law School[128] believe Cruz meets
    the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency.[129]

    There is some case law authority that says that if a “parent” maintains her
    citizenship and is away in another country when she gives birth, the
    child is a U.S. citizen. However, if a parent applies for citizenship
    in the foreign country, isn’t that firm evidence that she does not have
    any intention of moving back to the U.S.? If afterwards the mother
    has a baby, is the baby an automatic citizen of the U.S.?

    Professor McManamon believes generally that
    natural-born citizens must
    be born while living in a state of the United States, unless the
    parent was in the military or was an public official, such as an
    Ambassador, working overseas. Yet, this is not the case with Ted Cruz,
    which would make Cruz ineligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from
    Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen.[130] Orly Taitz, Larry
    Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging
    Obama’s eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[131][132]

    In November
    2015, two ballot challenges were filed in New Hampshire, alleging Cruz was
    ineligible because he was born in Canada.[133] The ballot
    commission rejected the challenges.

    Here are the list of lawsuits against Ted Cruz challenging him being
    disqualified because he was born in Canada and was a Canadian citizen
    until 2014, although he claimed dual citizenship.

    Federal

    Green v. Cruz (N.D. Ala. 5:16-cv-00207): complaint, amended complaint (filed Feb. 3, 2016)

    Librace v. Martin (E.D. Ark. 4:16-cv-00057): complaint (filed Feb. 3, 2016)

    Schwartz v. Cruz (S.D. Tex. 4:16-cv-00106): complaint, motion to intervene by Terry Wayne Wheelock, second amended complaint (filed Feb. 3, 2016)

    Wagner v. Cruz (D. Utah 2:16-cv-00055): complaint (filed Jan. 22, 2016)

    State

    Voeltz v. Cruz (Broward County, Fla. Circuit Ct. CACE15022044): docket (hearing March 4)

    Joyce v. Cruz (Illinois): pending, not yet available electronically, news stories here and here (hearing March 1)

    Korman v. New York State Board of Elections (New York County, Supreme Ct. 100240/2016): memorandum of law

    Paige v. Vermont (Washington Civil Div., Vt. Sup. Ct. 780-12-15 Wncv): complaint

    Actually, there is not a definitive Supreme Court Case that has settled
    the issue once and for all.

    The Congress and voters gave a pass on John McCain, born on a military
    base in Panama, and Obama being born in Hawaii, because Obaman came up
    with a birth certificate that he was born in Hawaii, when his mother was
    American born and his father was born in Kenya. (It’s too late to
    pursue the Obama “birther” issues, as Obaman will be out of office too
    soon)

    Will Ted Cruz be disqualified, as his mother was a native born U.S.
    citizen, and his father was a naturalized U.S..citizen but born in Cuba,
    while Ted Cruz was born in Canada while they resided there. His mother
    became a Canadian citizens before Ted Cruz was born, which made Ted
    Cruz a Canadian citizen. He claims that his mother was also a U.S.
    citizen since she did not renounce her U.S. Citizenship.

    The Supreme Court may rule in Ted Cruz’s favor. Why? The reason is
    that the Supreme Court Justices believe that the Constitution is a
    “living document” not one chiseled in stone, and the Supreme Court
    Justices adjusts its language to apply new ideas to be decided. For
    example, when the Constitution was written there were slaves, and it
    took the 13th and 14th Amendments to end slavery and to grant all people
    equal rights. Yet, it took the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 under
    Republican President Eisenhower to start the civil rights legislation to
    stop discrimination, and then this was followed under Democrat
    President Johnson to past the 1964 and 1965Civil Rights Act Regarding
    the 1964 Civil Rights Act, only 63% of the House Democrats and 69% of
    the Senate voted for the Bill. On the other hand, regarding the 1964
    Civil Rights Act 80% of the House and 83% of the Senate voted for the
    Bill. Republicans have championed civil rights. Martin Luther King was
    a Republican, not a Democrat. The alleged Republican opposition to
    civil rights is one of the biggest lies by the Democrats. Repoublicans
    have always chanpioned eqaul rights for all people, starting withAbraham
    Lincoln. Blacks aer worse off under Obama than they were before he
    was elected President. Since Black Americans want a better life, better
    jobs, the right to enter into business, a better education, then they
    are better off voting for the one who is going to bring more jobs back
    to America.

    People talk about race; however, the talk is really about the color
    green! Everyone wants more money, less taxes, less government spending,
    less money spent on wars, less education costs, less businesses leaving
    America. Everyone has to decide for himself or herself who has the
    business sense to do this on a large scale.

    • Ted Cruz is NOT a natural born citizen which is required for the President and Commander in Chief. To be a natural born citizen requires both parents to be citizens at the time of birth. That’s it and it was clear to the framers of the Constitution at the time of the writing and signing.

      • Exactly. It is not defined in our constitution because there was no need to define it. At the time of the writing of our constitution the meaning and concept of “natural born citizen” was well known and understood.

    • I should add to my comment that a natural born citizen cannot be made or taken away by statute or act of congress. It is a fact of birth. It’s actually a very simple concept, but the powers that be do everything to obscure the truth for obvious reasons.

    • Cruz is very clearly NOT eligible to our presidency. The term “natural born citizen” is not defined in our constitution because at the time of writing there was no need or reason to define it as it was well known what it meant. Vattel’s book “Law of Nations” was the guide with which our constitution was designed and that book very clearly explains what a natural born citizen is…Cruz is not one of them.

  3. Future 45th President of the United of the United States of America, Mr. Donald John Trump, Jr.
    handily won the Nevada Primary last night and took all 30 Delegates and left the rest of the Republican field empty!
    (1.) Trump – 46% = 30 Delegates
    (2.) Rubio – 24% = No Delegates
    (3.) Cruz – 21% = No Delegates
    (4.) Carson – 5% = No Delegates
    (5.)Kasich – 4% = No Delegates

    SO BE IT

    Texas is next and The Donald will walk away with all 155 Delegates leaving Rubio, Cruz, Carson and Kasich naked in the cold again!

    SO BE IT

Leave a Reply